Dear Peter Gluck,
It is clear that you are misrepresenting my statements in your new article.
“Q: May I ask you about Andrea Rossi? The best living US LENR journalist has decided to ignore his work completely and a site aiming to shut him down says communist style they “will be happy to meet you in court” if you dare to disagree with their opinion and agenda of debunking Rossi as a fraud and scammer. What do you think?
A: About that Gary Wright? You told he has strong certainties- however not strong enough to sign an official document that he will make seppuku if Rossi succeeds to demonstrate and put on the market a commercial Ni-H energy generator.”
a) My comment was not “communist style.” I believe in the right for everyone to say and believe whatever they choose. What I do not think is right is for someone to violate laws and morals by carrying on a fraud and scam, defrauding people out of their money. And in this case I am devoting a little of my time and effort by concentrating on Andrea Rossi’s e-Cat scam and fraud, only because it is connected to cold fusion/LENR.
b) I could care less if someone disagrees with me or not. We are putting on this website – facts – bringing to light details of Rossi’s scam and fraud, which also includes bringing to light information that connects other people to Rossi’s project, even sometimes indirectly. This website is another source of information for people to use to try and determine if they should believe that Andrea Rossi and the e-Cat is a fraud and scam or not, and to act on that decision, using all information available, however they choose.
c) The article on this website that relates to the “court” issue you mention was in response to many other people, some partners with Rossi who have made public statements that Gary Wright and people like me, will be sued in court by them and/or Rossi. In that article we stated our position and said that if anyone wants to sue us in court, for making those statements, we would be happy to meet them there.
Here is a link to the article: Rossi 1 Year Later
We did NOT say we have any desire to take anyone to court over anything, we just said that we would be happy to defend ourselves in court if someone else thought they might want to challenge our statements and/or claims by that method.
d) I find it totally amazing that someone would try to get me to sign some ridiculous “official” document, just because I am critical of the e-Cat fraud and scam, and then when I ignore that call, they try to use that against me as if that proved anything. But yet at the same time the person calling for me to sign some statement has never asked all of the people involved in Rossi’s e-Cat scam and fraud to sign anything.
e) If the person requesting me to sign this “official” document had any sense of justice or fairness they would also put out a call for every person, scientist, or engineer connected to Rossi’s e-Cat fraud and scam to sign an “official” document like I have proposed in the article you are complaining about.
f) I am NOT the one claiming to have a working cold fusion/LENR device that will create overunity and 10KW of excess heat power, Andrea Rossi is.
g) I am NOT the one claiming to be selling, and have sold many, working and stable, 1 MW cold fusion/LENR e-cat power plants, Andrea Rossi is.
h) I am NOT the one selling licenses for the right to sell products that do not exist, and lying about the product availability, Andrea Rossi is.
I) I am NOT the one that claims to have a working cold fusion/LENR device that is operating in self sustaining mode at an operating temperature of over 1000 C, Andrea Rossi is.
j) I am NOT the one lying about working relationships with other companies, Andrea Rossi is.
k) I am NOT the one lying and making hundreds of false statements about everything to do with the e-Cat fraud and scam, Andrea Rossi is.
l) I am NOT the one who lied to the US patent office by submitting a document co-authored by him claiming that he heated a factory for over two years with a working stable cold fusion/LENR e-Cat, but now after five (5) years of trying, both in private and in public, cannot put on a public demonstration lasting more than a few hours, Andrea Rossi is.
m) I am NOT the one claiming they can create vast amounts of rare isotopes of Nickel very cheaply without using the normal known materials and methods, but refusing to publish or disclose that method, Andrea Rossi is.
n) I am NOT the one claiming they can transmute 30% of the Nickel in a cold fusion/LENR reactor into copper, then sending this false information to the US patent office, trying thereby to obtain a patent under false pretenses, Andrea Rossi is.
o) I an NOT the one who lied about the type of SGS certification obtained, and what they could legally do with the actual one they did obtain, Andrea Rossi is.
p) I am NOT the one lying about having a factory in Florida, USA, then changing my story when confronted by real authorities, IN PERSON, who will lock me up if I lie to them. Then go back to lying to the public about the very same issue, after the authorities went away, Andrea Rossi is.
q) etc. etc. ad nauseum.
Mr. Gluck you say:
About Andrea Rossi? Actually I am convinced, much more firmly than you, that he has discovered something new and very important for LENR. How? He knows! He says that evil forces are making impossible for him to get a solid patent. The truth is that he does not need and does not want any patent, because he first of all he wants to keep his process, his problems, his weaknesses, his errors and searches as secret as possible as long as he can.
In response to that comment I will say this:
a) Where did you ever get the idea Rossi does not want or need any patent?
b) First of all Rossi applied for and received one patent on his e-Cat device already from Italy. Why did he do that if he did not want or need a patent?
c) Second, Rossi has mentioned hundreds of times in interviews, on video, and on his website that he wants and needs more patent coverage.
d) Third, your own statement says that Rossi is complaining because he cannot get his patents that are still pending. Why would he complain if he did not want or need them?
e) Fourth, Rossi has mentioned hundreds of times in interviews, on video, and on his website about what will happen in some future time, things that depend on him receiving that patent coverage. Why would Rossi make these statements if he did not want or need more patents?
f) You say, “because he first of all he wants to keep his process, his problems, his weaknesses, his errors and searches as secret as possible as long as he can.” Rossi’s own actions show just the opposite. Rossi has put on many private demonstrations, and many (over 8) public demonstrations. Rossi has conducted over 50 interviews for public media. Rossi has over 10,000 comments on his own public blog, over 3,000 are his own comments, talking about every detail of the e-Cat fraud and scam, including all of the things you mention.
What is the reason you would make such a statement? One that is so very easily contradicted? Since you have no proof for the claims made by Andrea Rossi, are you just making things up as you go along, so you can continue to believe in your own e-cat fantasy?
So in conclusion, yes I believe the e-Cat is a fraud and a scam, I am very certain of that, and I have seen nothing, even of the slightest nature, to convince me otherwise.
And in the future, Mr. Gluck, please try not to misrepresent my words.
Joy & Peace
December 22, 2012